Firm | Worth | Change | %Change |
---|
The Nationwide Firm Legislation Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on February 19 refused to grant an interim stay on the Committee of Collectors (CoC) from contemplating or rejecting Riju Raveendran’s proposed ₹158 crore settlement with the Board of Management for Cricket in India (BCCI) in Byju’s ongoing insolvency proceedings.
Raveendran, a director at Byju’s and the brother of co-founder Byju Raveendran, had moved NCLAT after the Nationwide Firm Legislation Tribunal (NCLT) declined to shut the insolvency proceedings via a settlement. As an alternative, the tribunal directed the CoC to take a remaining name on the matter.
The insolvency case was initiated by BCCI over Byju’s failure to pay ₹158 crore beneath its terminated sponsorship settlement. In an try and resolve the dispute, Raveendran proposed a full settlement of the dues, in search of to halt the insolvency course of.
Nevertheless, US lenders—who maintain over 99% of the CoC—have strongly opposed the settlement, pushing for the continuation of the insolvency proceedings.
Raveendran’s plea at NCLAT sought a stay on the CoC’s deliberation over his proposal, however the appellate tribunal refused to intervene at this stage. With NCLAT’s determination, the CoC will now overview and resolve on the settlement offer.
Byju’s, as soon as India’s most useful edtech startup, is battling extreme monetary misery amid mounting authorized troubles and a liquidity crunch. The case stays a key check for the corporate’s future, as collectors and stakeholders assess their subsequent steps.
First Printed: Feb 19, 2025 4:54 PM IST
Source link
#NCLAT #refuses #stay #CoC #reviewing #Riju #Raveendrans #BCCI #settlement #offer #CNBC #TV18