Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Fires Back at Blake Lively’s Motion to Dismiss

Justin Baldoni‘s lawyer is firing again at Blake Full of life‘s try to lower herself out of the continued authorized drama surrounding the movie, “It Ends with Us.”

Bryan Freedman tells TMZ … “Ms. Lively’s latest movement to dismiss herself from the self-concocted catastrophe she initiated is without doubt one of the most abhorrent examples of abusing our authorized system.”

Freedman says “stringent guidelines are put into place to shield the harmless and permit people to rightfully defend themselves,” whereas noting “legal guidelines will not be meant to be twisted and curated by privileged elites to match their very own private agenda.”

Earlier at the moment … TMZ broke the story that Blake filed her movement to dismiss, saying Baldoni violated the regulation by submitting his personal lawsuit for the needs of revenge.

Blake says Baldoni filed his defamation go well with towards her, her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her publicist, Leslie Sloane, proper after she filed her lawsuit towards him. In her go well with, Blake accused Justin of sexually harassing her, and launching a smear marketing campaign through the filming of the flick. As you already know, Baldoni was the film’s director and Blake’s costar.

As we reported Wednesday … Reynolds was first to file a movement to be dismissed from Baldoni’s go well with, claiming Justin labeled him a “predator.” However, Reynolds argued, it isn’t defamation as a result of he believes the assertion to be true, and Justin would have to show in any other case.

In his assertion to TMZ, Freedman reiterated … “As we mentioned yesterday in response to Mr. Reynolds’ identical cowardly measures, we are going to proceed to maintain Ms. Full of life accountable for her actions of pure malice which embrace falsely accusing my purchasers of harassment and retaliation.”

Freedman summed it up by saying Blake’s “fantastical claims shall be swiftly debunked as discovery strikes ahead, simply disproved with precise, evidentiary proof.”