Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favorite tales on this weekly publication.
Goldman Sachs obtained the bottom stage of shareholder support for its executives’ pay packages in virtually a decade, following criticism over bonuses for chief govt David Solomon and president John Waldron value $80mn every.
In a so-called say on pay vote at Goldman’s annual basic assembly on Wednesday, 66 per cent of votes backed the funding financial institution’s pay plans, the bottom stage of support since 2016.
The vote additionally marks the bottom support for an enormous US financial institution’s pay proposals since 2022, when JPMorgan Chase shareholders rebelled over chief govt Jamie Dimon’s remuneration package deal.
That 12 months, solely one-third of JPMorgan shareholders supported Dimon’s pay, which included a particular award value about $50mn on the time. JPMorgan subsequently mentioned it might not give its CEO particular awards in future.
Whereas the Goldman vote is nonbinding, the muted stage of support displays investor unease with the financial institution’s plans to pay its prime two executives retention bonuses extra akin to a personal capital group.

Proxy advisers Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Providers had really useful that shareholders vote towards the pay plans.
Goldman, whose largest shareholders embrace Vanguard, BlackRock and State Avenue, awarded the five-year retention bonuses to Solomon and Waldron in January.
The awards for Solomon and Waldron, which got here on prime of their annual pay of $39mn and $38mn respectively, have added to hypothesis that Waldron is probably to succeed Solomon as chief govt.
Glass Lewis criticised the financial institution for not tying the awards to efficiency metrics. Goldman had defended the awards, saying they have been wanted to retain its prime expertise and that paying them 100 per cent in inventory meant they have been aligned with shareholders’ pursuits.
Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, Goldman’s fifteenth largest shareholder, mentioned it had voted towards the pay packages.
“The [company’s] board ought to present transparency on whole remuneration to keep away from unacceptable outcomes,” Norges Financial institution Funding Administration mentioned. “The board ought to be certain that all advantages have a transparent enterprise rationale.”
Calstrs, a big Californian pension fund, additionally mentioned it voted towards Goldman’s pay.
Source link
#Investor #support #Goldman #bosses #pay #sinks #9year