Bombay HC draws curtain on 1947 land dispute | India News – The Times of India

MUMBAI: A swimsuit relationship again to the 12 months India acquired independence lastly stood disposed of by the Bombay excessive courtroom this month, with the fourth technology of the unique land proprietor amicably settling a property dispute. The property included huge parts of the village of Dahisar in north Mumbai. The space was a whopping 2,891 acres or over 1,100 hectares. It was 3.5 instances the scale of Central Park in New York.Over the many years, the authorized battle noticed repeated pleas towards sale of parcels of land in Dahisar to personal events, in addition to an acquisition by the state underneath the Salsette Legislation and Forest Act.Justice Farhan Dubash, one of the most recent judges of the excessive courtroom, put a quietus by way of a consent time period order to the authorized tussle 78 years, or over three quarters of a century later, on a swimsuit filed on Oct 7, 1947.The unique swimsuit had sought administration of the property of one Haji Alimohammed Haji Cassum following his demise, as per private legal guidelines relevant. It was filed by Badrushama, widow of Suleman Haji Alimohammed Haji Cassum, versus Salim Dawood Agboatwala and others.Justice Dubash, started his order with: “This order disposes of most likely the oldest Swimsuit that’s at the moment pending earlier than the Bombay excessive courtroom.”Through the years, a number of orders have been handed within the matter, together with a preliminary decree handed on Nov 25, 1952 that decided the authorized share of all heirs.Earlier than that, the HC appointed a courtroom receiver in 1950 to take care of the property. Successive generations continued the authorized battle earlier than the HC. Lastly, with the litigation getting into the fourth technology, all heirs determined to amicably settle. They filed consent phrases earlier than the HC on Feb 5. The phrases have been accepted, and the swimsuit was struck off from a pendency checklist to a disposed one.This verdict resulted in a single of the longest pending circumstances within the historical past of the Bombay HC coming to a detailed.The HC recorded the settlement arrived at between the events after listening to Kevic Setalvad, senior counsel with advocate Vijaylaxmi Kulkarni showing for the plaintiffs, and Anupam Surve, counsel with solicitor Nanu Hormasjee and Co for contesting heirs.The settlement was between Ateeq Anwar Agboatwala, an influence of lawyer holder for the primary plaintiff, and different members of the Agboatwala household.On the finish of the settlement, what was payable to the courtroom receiver in the direction of prices and prices within the matter was Rs 7 lakh. After deducting this quantity, the remainder of the undisclosed quantity is to be returned on or earlier than Feb 20, 2026 to the household.