Fresh plaint: CM Siddu’s wife owned, sold site & how? – Star of Mysore

• CM Siddaramaiah allegedly bought a site allotted in Dattagalli to his shut aide and former MLA M. Sathyanarayana, who later sold it to Parvathi
• RTI activist Snehamayi Krishna palms over grievance to Lokayukta SP T.J. Udesh

Mysuru: In a contemporary allegation, Proper to Data (RTI) activist Snehamayi Krishna, has accused Chief Minister Siddaramaiah of meticulously getting a benami site allotted within the title of his aide, solely to facilitate the acquisition of the identical site by his wife B.M. Parvathi, to rake in a moolah by reselling the site to a different individual.

Krishna, the complainant within the case of 50:50 site rip-off at Mysuru City Improvement Authority (MUDA), by which Siddaramaiah and his relations together with his wife are going through a Lokayukta probe, for getting 14 various websites allotted in upscale Vijayanagar locality in metropolis, has made contemporary allegations, together with substantiating paperwork, accusing how Siddaramaiah, throughout his earlier stint because the Dy. CM, acquired many property within the title of his wife, via unscrupulous means.

Krishna, who submitted a written grievance to Lokayukta Mysuru SP T.J. Udesh, in relation to the contemporary allegations made towards CM Siddaramaiah yesterday, categorically accused the CM of buying many benami properties by misusing his workplace.

He alleged that, Siddaramaiah bought Site No. 5338 at Dattagalli, allotted within the title of former Chamundeshwari MLA late M. Sathyanarayana (Sathyappa) from MUDA. As per norms, no site allottee is permitted to promote the site to a different occasion for a interval of 10 years, from the date of site allotment. A letter of dedication was additionally registered on this regard.

After 5.5 years on Mar. 2, 2002, Sathyanarayana, sold the site to Parvathi for Rs. 24 lakh,  violating the ten-12 months interval capping on promoting the site. On July 6, 2014, Parvathi, sold the identical site to Sulochana Ramesh, for Rs. 1 crore, gaining a revenue of Rs. 76 lakh.

Krishna, in his grievance to Lokayukta SP has demanded probe in these angles; whether or not there was a point out of this site within the affidavit submitted by Siddaramaiah to the Election Fee and the affidavit submitted to Lokayukta and whereas submitting the Revenue Tax (IT) returns.

Moreover, the supply of income of Parvathi, to purchase such an extent of websites needs to be investigated, not ignoring the properties owned by CM Siddaramaiah couple.

The State exchequer has incurred an enormous loss of about Rs. 5,000 crore as a result of unlawful allotment of websites at MUDA. Aside from the continued probe into 14 various websites (that was returned to MUDA by Parvathi because the controversy raged) allotted to CM ’s wife Parvathi, all of the scams in MUDA, needs to be fully investigated, urged Krishna.

Site offers at Authorities Visitor Home, house!

RTI activist Snehamayi Krishna has accused Parvathi Siddaramaiah of wielding undue clout, partaking within the fulfilment of procedures associated to purchasing and promoting of websites, at her consolation in Authorities Visitor Home at Nazarbad in metropolis.

Each Parvathi and former MLA Sathyanarayana, fulfilled the formalities associated to the registration of site by summoning the employees from the Sub-Registrar’s Workplace to the Authorities Visitor Home. Parvathi’s brother M.B. Mallikarjuna Swamy has signed as a witness.

It’s certainly a transparent violation of regulation, that the Authorities facility is being misused by the CM’s wife to fulfil the formalities associated to the acquisition of a number of websites thus far, which in any other case wouldn’t have been potential, with out the blessings of her husband CM Siddaramaiah. What’s intriguing additional is, when Parvathi sold the Dattagalli site to Sulochana Ramesh, the employees from Sub-Registrar’s Workplace was summoned to the previous’s T.Okay. Format residence, a transparent instance of how the CM’s wife acted in response to her whims. The regulation, the truth is permits the method of registration of properties at house too, however on sure grounds. The moot query is whether or not Parvathi was eligible for a similar?