The federal government on Wednesday clarified that content created with the assistance of synthetic intelligence for educational functions, bringing clarity or making technical modifications with out misrepresentation needn’t be labelled as synthetically generated.
The clarification got here within the type of FAQs a day after the federal government tightened guidelines for social media platforms similar to YouTube and X, mandating the takedown of illegal content inside three hours, and requiring clear labelling of all AI-generated and synthetic content.
In an inventory of steadily requested questions (FAQs), the Ministry of Electronics and IT has defined that content created in good religion, like schooling and coaching supplies, displays, decreasing file dimension for sooner add, publishing discover, and many others., with using synthetic intelligence, won’t be thought-about as synthetically generated content (SGI).
“Not each AI-assisted creation or enhancing qualifies as SGI. Content is handled as SGI solely when it’s artificially or algorithmically created or altered in a approach that it seems actual or genuine or true and is more likely to be indistinguishable from an actual particular person or real-world occasion,” it mentioned.
Elaborating additional, it mentioned that routine or good religion actions similar to enhancing, formatting, enhancement, technical correction, color adjustment, noise discount, transcription, or compression shall not be handled as SGI, supplied such actions don’t materially alter, distort, or misrepresent the substance, context or that means of the underlying content.
The Ministry of Electronics and Data Expertise (MeitY) issued a gazette notification, amending the Data Expertise (Middleman Tips and Digital Media Ethics Code) Guidelines, 2021. The new guidelines will come into power on February 20, 2026.
The FAQ on the new guidelines defined that use of expertise to take away background noise in an audio recording, transcribing an audio or video interview into textual content stabilising a shaky video or correcting color steadiness won’t be thought-about SGI.
The IT ministry has clarified that routine or good-faith creation or preparation, formatting, designing paperwork, displays, PDF information, educational or coaching supplies, or analysis outputs won’t be handled as SGI so long as it doesn’t lead to creation of false paperwork or false digital data.
Nevertheless, if AI instruments are used to generate pretend certificates, pretend official letters, solid IDs or fabricated digital data, such content won’t fall under these exclusions and could also be handled as illegal SGI or false data.
The FAQ additionally clarified that using pc sources solely for enhancing accessibility, clarity, high quality, translation, description, searchability, or discoverability shall not be handled as SGI, supplied the method doesn’t generate or alter or manipulate any materials a part of the underlying content.
It mentioned that using AI for including subtitles to movies, translation of a speech or video into one other language with out manipulating content, auto-generated summaries or tags for enhancing search, audio description for visually impaired customers or enhancing clarity by decreasing echo or distortion can be exempted from the SGI definition.
The new guidelines which have are available response to the rising misuse of synthetic intelligence to create and flow into obscene, misleading and faux content on social media platforms require embedding of everlasting metadata or identifier with AI content and ban content thought-about unlawful within the eyes of legislation, in addition to shorten person grievance redressal timelines.
Within the run-up to the foundations, authorities had flagged an increase in AI-generated deepfakes, non-consensual intimate imagery and deceptive movies that impersonate people or fabricate real-world occasions, usually spreading quickly on-line.
The amended IT guidelines purpose to curb such abuse by requiring sooner takedowns, necessary labelling of AI-generated content and stronger accountability from platforms to forestall the promotion and amplification of illegal synthetic materials. It locations the onus on each social media platforms and AI instruments.
Printed on February 12, 2026
Source link
#AIassisted #content #educational #objective #clarity #exempt #synthetic #labelling #rule
