Chirayu Rana’s lawyer exits case, informs court Rana will represent himself against Lorna Hajdini

Chirayu Rana’s lawyer exits the case and informs the court that Rana himself will represent his case against Lorna Hajdini.

On the first listening to of the high-octane Chirayu Rana case the place the Nepali-origin ex-JPMorgan banker alleged sexual harassment by co-worker Lorna Hajdini, Chirayu Rana’s lawyer knowledgeable the court that he will be exiting the case. Daniel Kaiser, who beforehand represented Jeffret Epstein accusers, filed a consent to be discharged as Rana’s lawyer simply hours earlier than they have been as a consequence of seem in court. Nonetheless, Kaiser represented Rana for the Might 26 listening to and knowledgeable the court that sooner or later, Rana will represent himself, often known as professional se, unti; he finds a brand new counsel.The case grabbed headlines as Chirayu Rana introduced severe allegations against Hajdini that she made him her intercourse slave — allegations that Hajdini and the corporate dismissed. A number of particulars of the case emerged revealing that the corporate was keen to settle the case internally with Chirayu Rana and supplied him cash however he demanded extra money after which lastly resorted to a lawsuit against Hajdini.Hajdini additionally had a change of lawyer and is now being represented by Samuel S Shaulson of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP. Shaulson represented Morgan Stanley in a 2018 case wherein a male worker accused each the financial institution and 7 named workers, 4 of whom have been feminine, of discriminating against him.In that case, Mahmoud Latif, a homosexual Muslim affiliate at Morgan Stanley, argued that the financial institution each discriminated and harassed him due to his sexual orientation, faith and different protected traits. Shortly after he was employed in 2017, Latif argued {that a} feminine supervisor at Morgan Stanley sexually assaulted him and subjected him to inappropriate touching and sexual advances. Morgan Stanley settled Latif’s case for an unknown quantity in 2021.For the reason that case was filed, Rana’s lawyer Kaiser defended Rana and countered many claims. One such declare was that Chirayu Rana as soon as took bereavement go away from JPMorgan citing his father’s loss of life whereas his father continues to be alive. Kaiser defended and mentioned it was for the loss of life of a father-figure.