The dispute stems from an enchantment filed by MSEDCL earlier than the Appellate Tribunal for Electrical energy (APTEL) towards a December 24, 2025, order handed by the Maharashtra Electrical energy Regulatory Fee (MERC).
In its earlier order, MERC had rejected MSEDCL’s rivalry on the applicability of the Centre’s route beneath Part 11 of the Electrical energy Act, 2003, to JSW Energy’s Ratnagiri unit.
Additionally Learn: JSW Energy arm faces ₹1,447-cr water cost demand in Chhattisgarh, challenges order
The fee had additionally directed MSEDCL to pay the tariff in line with the ability buy settlement dated February 23, 2010, together with the relevant late fee surcharge.
JSW Energy stated MSEDCL later moved the Supreme Court via a civil enchantment difficult an interim order handed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electrical energy, which had rejected its plea to keep the MERC order.
The Supreme Court, in its order dated April 30, 2026 and uploaded on its web site on Might 5, 2026, disposed of the civil enchantment. As a part of the order, the courtroom directed MSEDCL to make an interim half fee of ₹250 crore to JSW Energy and requested APTEL to re-hear the interim utility filed by MSEDCL.
Additionally Learn: JSW Energy to double Salboni thermal energy mission to 3,200 MW; funding rising to ₹40,000 crore
Shares of JSW Energy Ltd ended at ₹562.00, down by ₹0.65, or 0.12%, on the BSE.
Source link
#Supreme #Court #directs #MSEDCL #pay #crore #JSW #Energy #tariff #dispute #CNBC #TV18
