No Sh_T Sherlock, Another Study Finds That Just Because Your Students Do Well At Advantaged School Doesn’t Mean You’ll Have The Same Success At A Low-Income One

Ah, this current examine introduced again reminiscences of a Sacramento Bee editorial that recommended that because the one district highschool that required high-grades and test-scores to enter had excessive achievement measurements, then these educators might present the remainder of us what we had been doing flawed (I beforehand wrote about that at New Study Reaffirms What Most Academics Know – Pupil Take a look at Scores Don’t Present Correct Evaluation Of Faculties).

This current examine, Proof from the Random Project of Switch Incentives, discovered that lecturers who acquired a $20,000 bonus to switch from high-achieving faculties to lower-achieving ones weren’t actually capable of get the identical outcomes from their college students.

Huh. Who would have thought?

I’m including this information to The Finest Locations To Study What Influence A Trainer (& Outdoors Elements) Have On Pupil Achievement.

Addendum: Matt Barnum has written an excellent abstract of the examine.

And right here’s an excellent abstract of the examine:

Nice practitioner-facing abstract of our new paper by Rachel Schechter and its implications for:

➡️trainer hiring
➡️trainer induction
➡️trainer teaching
➡️principal management

gamma.app/docs/Is-Teac…

[image or embed]

— Matthew A Kraft (@matthewakraft.com) February 19, 2026 at 5:25 AM

The 74 additionally has a abstract: Why Even High Academics Could Battle in Low-Performing Faculties

And the examine’s authors have additionally compiled a abstract.

Amber Northern offers an important abstract of our new WP on the portability of trainer effectiveness throughout totally different faculty contexts in her @educationgadfly Analysis Minute. Give it a hear! https://t.co/Ba3X0KSEQg

— Matthew A. Kraft (@MatthewAKraft) March 12, 2026